Monday - Friday / 09:00 - 18:00

Alternative dispute resolution methods are processes that allow legal disputes between parties to be addressed without resorting to court proceedings, or before litigation, through methods such as mediation, conciliation, settlement negotiations and arbitration. These methods are evaluated according to the nature of the dispute, the demands of the parties, the applicable procedure and the legal outcome that will arise at the end of the process.
Alternative dispute resolution methods provide the parties with a more flexible, faster and, in many cases, more controlled basis for resolution. However, each method does not produce the same result for every dispute. Therefore, at the beginning of the process, it should be legally assessed whether the dispute is suitable for mediation, conciliation, settlement or arbitration.
Alternative dispute resolution methods consist of different mechanisms aimed at resolving disputes outside court or before court proceedings. Each of these methods has its own procedure, legal consequences and area of application.
Mediation
Mandatory mediation as a condition for litigation
Voluntary mediation
Conciliation and settlement negotiations
Arbitration
Domestic and international arbitration
In mediation and conciliation processes, the resolution is based on the mutual will of the parties. In arbitration, however, the dispute is concluded by a decision rendered by an arbitrator or arbitral tribunal. Therefore, when choosing between alternative dispute resolution methods, not only the functioning of the process but also how the decision or agreement will be enforced should be taken into account.
An arbitral award is a decision rendered at the end of arbitration proceedings and produces legal consequences for the parties. This decision is the fundamental element that distinguishes arbitration from mediation and conciliation.
The annulment, recognition, enforcement or execution of an arbitral award is evaluated separately depending on the nature of the dispute, the type of arbitration and the procedure under which the award was rendered. Therefore, during the arbitration process, the validity of the arbitration agreement, the authority of the arbitral tribunal and the parties’ right to defense must be carefully examined.
The role of an attorney in alternative dispute resolution methods is to determine the legal framework of the process and ensure that the party proceeds without suffering any loss of rights. The attorney evaluates which resolution method is suitable for the dispute, prepares the application process, develops the negotiation strategy and reviews settlement documents.
When preparing a mediation settlement agreement, settlement protocol or arbitration clause, the text must be clear, enforceable and suitable for the legal position of the parties. The consequences of enforceability, annulment, recognition or enforcement that may arise at the end of the process should also be evaluated separately.
Alternative dispute resolution methods provide the parties with greater control over the resolution. In some disputes, the process may be completed in a shorter time, confidentiality may be preserved and a basis for resolution may be established without completely breaking the relationship between the parties.
However, not every method is suitable for every dispute. In mediation and conciliation, if one of the parties does not demonstrate the will to resolve the dispute, no agreement can be reached. Arbitration, on the other hand, is a more technical and costly process that must be conducted carefully in terms of procedure. Therefore, mediation, conciliation and arbitration options should be evaluated separately according to the nature of the dispute.
Alternative dispute resolution methods are used in private law disputes over which the parties may freely dispose. Labor law disputes, commercial disputes, consumer disputes, lease relationships, contractual receivables and certain compensation claims may be evaluated within this scope.
If no agreement is reached during the mediation process, a final report is prepared and the process ends. In files conducted within the scope of mandatory mediation as a condition for litigation, the parties may file a lawsuit after the final report is prepared.
In mediation, the parties resolve the dispute through their own mutual will. The mediator does not render a decision, but only manages the negotiation process. In arbitration, however, the dispute is examined by an arbitrator or arbitral tribunal and the process ends with an arbitral award.